• Categories
    • Unread
    • Recent
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Android Wear

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Computing
    19 Posts 6 Posters 1.5k Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • AlmostA Offline
      Almost
      last edited by

      @Scuzz Still missing the passive glancability. You still need to act to determine whether or not your notification is actionable.

      What are the steps to check a text while you’re walking?

      1. Pull out phone
      2. Wake it up
      3. if you don’t have a lock screen notification, pull down the notification bar

      Same thing with checking the weather or making sure your meeting is actually where you think it is. I don’t know about you guys but when people (including myself) do this there’s a much higher chance that they’re going to run into me or something else.

      When you have it on your wrist (or on your face in the case of glass) it’s truly just a glance. Quickly glancing at your phone still requires you to go get your phone.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
      • ScuzzS Offline
        Scuzz
        last edited by

        My hands are usually by my side when I’m walking about so they are in close proximity to my pockets. When i feel a message i pull my phone out press the button on the way up. The screen is usually on way before i even glance down at my phone. Then it goes back into my pocket. If I need to reply or do anything else, i stand to the side so people don’t walk into me and i don’t walk into them.

        I can understand for quick glances but i personally don’t need to save about 2 seconds when checking a notification.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
        • SchamperS Offline
          Schamper
          last edited by Schamper

          It’s those 2 seconds that take too long for me when checking the time though.
          Looking at my wrist is just easier and quicker.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
          • AlmostA Offline
            Almost
            last edited by

            @Scuzz - Yeah, I’m sure I’m in the minority of people here who think they would use it.

            I’m also one of the few who think a macbook is worth the expense, but does that make it a gimmicky product? (I know this analogy is a bit of a stretch, but I’m more trying to point out the difference between “would I use it?” vs “will it catch on?”)

            I really think that the general consumer will be sold on the idea once they get their hands on one. The bigger question IMO is whether companies will market it right to get people to try them.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
            • LeoL Offline
              Leo
              last edited by

              The thing is @scuzz, its not about the two seconds. Whenever I am talking to someone I don’t like it when they pull out their phone, even for a quick glance, but when they look at their watch for a quick glance I feel nothing. I don’t know if I am just being a bitch, but I’d use any tech-watch if it allowed me to subtly check who sent me a message.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
              • ScuzzS Offline
                Scuzz
                last edited by

                Until you realise they are actually reading their text messages and not checking the time. You’ll end up feeling the same way.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
                • LeoL Offline
                  Leo
                  last edited by

                  @Scuzz ignorance is bliss.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
                  • SchamperS Offline
                    Schamper
                    last edited by Schamper

                    @Scuzz But would you read an entire text message on your watch? Personally I’d only check if I have a message, and read it after I’m done talking.

                    I suppose the idea would stay the same though.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
                    • ScuzzS Offline
                      Scuzz
                      last edited by

                      Would this be the same OS that’s on glass or is that completely different?

                      I’m guessing they would all integrate with each other. I could see the touch screen on the watch being used to control menus and stuff on the glass. That would be pretty useful.
                      Does anyone actually have one yet or is it something you want.

                      AlmostA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
                      • AlmostA Offline
                        Almost @Scuzz
                        last edited by

                        @Scuzz I don’t think anything actually uses Wear yet. I think the SDK and emulator are just out in beta to get developers a head start.

                        That said, it is android Wear and not android Watch, so I wouldn’t be surprised if Glass ended up with it soon. I would expect wear to have a LOT of different interaction types and each device would only expose those that it supports.

                        It’s definitely something I want. Although the price point is going to be a deterrent for a while (I bet the moto360 is going to cost the same or even more than a full phone)

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        Online Users